Kurisutina

Stopped acquisition — partial coverage note

Partial reading: parts of this paper could not be read in full.

Superseded 2026-09-29 (main session): the full package was acquired and read; see the complete summary. This note is kept as the record of the stopped acquisition.

Status: INCOMPLETE. This is a coverage checkpoint, not a paper summary and not completed evidence. Work stopped on 29 September 2026 in response to the user's instruction to stop and consolidate. No further acquisition or paper reading was performed after that instruction.

Target: A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing, DOI 10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9, Nature 634, 210–219, published 2 October 2024. These identifiers were exposed in primary-source search results; a complete source/version audit was not conducted.

Exact exposure before stopping

One web search for the exact DOI returned primary Nature and PubMed records plus repository/navigation results. The returned Nature excerpts exposed the abstract; opening model/background paragraphs; selected concluding paragraphs about taste and grooming pathways; the Figure 1 title; two paragraphs about circuit testing and feeding initiation; the Extended Data Figure 1 caption; supplementary-file listings; data/code availability; selected reference entries; and publication, authorship, acknowledgment, disclosure and license information. PubMed supplied identifiers, including PMC11446845, and author metadata. Other search hits were navigation snippets and duplicate abstract material. None was opened as a further paper.

These fragments were seen in the search response. They were not a consecutive full reading and are not used here to formulate or validate scientific conclusions. No Methods, complete Results/Discussion, equations, figures, full bibliography, reporting summary or supplementary spreadsheet was read. No image was visually inspected. No extracted full text or scientific summary was written.

Files acquired but unread

The attempted parallel download command was interrupted at the tool boundary, without returning a live-session identifier or HTTP results. A later metadata-only filesystem check established that it had nevertheless saved these three files. Their content was not opened during consolidation:

Artifact Source URL Bytes SHA-256
papers/consciousness_connectomics/shiu2024_sensorimotor.html https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07763-9 668879 a887fda9a749cb72f79b7f9677ad2b32f4b56ffcd4460d85810c1d39900340bb
papers/consciousness_connectomics/shiu2024_sensorimotor.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07763-9.pdf 7770228 abf14d5bad39b7dcdd5c3383a81b55590992a2fe03ab3a226a2b873dae04abf6
papers/consciousness_connectomics/shiu2024_sensorimotor.pmc.html https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11446845/ 295439 880ee11d795080e7b119e7893c4d8be422bdeff03445f647a1d08f367e015116

The written scientific package is not acquired in full. Search metadata listed a reporting-summary PDF and a spreadsheet containing Supplementary Tables 1–12; neither was downloaded by this worker. File-format validity and completeness of the three acquired files remain unaudited.

Process checkpoint

One acquisition command used Python requests with three parallel HTTP requests and 60-second per-request timeouts. Its tool call was aborted by user intervention after one second and returned no session ID. A subsequent narrowly matched process check, outside the restricted process view, found no surviving process matching that owned acquisition command. No running acquisition was found to terminate. All acquired files were preserved. No simulation, source-code execution, external message or additional research request was initiated.

This summary is our record of the paper, written after reading the full text and published as written; links into our own repository have been removed.